Sunday, November 22, 2015

Raymond Williams: Cultural Turn of Marxism

Raymond Williams: Cultural Turn of Marxism and the Return of Politics                                                 

Studies about culture, literary theory, media studies, film studies, and Marxism of 21st century would have remained in the shadow of dogmatic thinking and sterile vocabulary of capitalist triumphalism, if Raymond Williams was not there with a new reading of the basics of Marxism. The birth of the new discipline of cultural studies owes a lot to the work of Williams on the newly built road of cultural materialism.  Outside the dominant Great Tradition of Leavis and his followers, away from the New Critics’ sacred close reading without context, passing the vulgar materialism of Soviet orthodoxy a group of intellectuals including E.P Thompson, Richard Hoggart, and Stuart Hall started a new formation with a new critical vocabulary indebted a lot to Gramsci, Frankfurt School, especially to Walter Benjamin, Althusser, later Sartre, Goldmann, and the newly found Grundrisse. The dichotomy between a minority culture against mass civilization, dating back to the days of Mathew Arnold endorsed in various tones by T.S Eliot, Thomas Mann, and many others, and the notion of culture as the best of thought and written in society have been questioned and unsettled by this turn of Marxism.
Williams began in his working class background a quest for locating culture, especially the literary one in the real world of real people along with the similar attempts of his comrades. The shocking exposure “culture is ordinary” eroded the elite fantasy of culture as a site for the privileged. The worldliness of culture and its ordinariness have been underscored with a new optimism in the subversive power of art and literature, a point of departure from the New Historicism that overlooked the radical dimension of art and literature. Instead of the notion of power as a totality that appropriates everything, the concept of hegemony took centre stage in the work of Williams. Seeing culture as a mere set of signifying practices independent of history loses the political content in it and the inevitable interconnection between political power and culture. The reinterpretation of hegemony as porous distribution of power is the most important contribution of Williams to read Gramsci (Alcala).
Cornel West equates Williams to Gramsci for injecting “notions of contestation and incorporation into the understanding of class conflict” (in Prendergast xi). The economic determinism prevailed in the official literature of the left and the often misconstrued category of base and superstructure have been contested while the structures of feeling and the enabling programmes of the avant- garde have been incorporated. “It is a position which can be briefly described as cultural materialism: a theory of the specificities of material cultural and literary production within historical materialism”(Williams 5).

Marxism and Literature

This book is the extension of what Williams started with The Long Revolution (1961) and Culture and Society (1958), a critical rewriting of cultural paradigms and theoretical assumptions that formed the foundation of materialism in order to develop the cultural materialism or the cultural politics of the new left. The misinterpretation of Marxist principles at the cost of state capitalism disguised as communism distorted the basics of Marxism. The abject distortion of it in the state prescribed socialist realism by Lunacharsky, Plekhanov, and to a certain extent by Trotsky and Christopher Caudwell in England, impoverished the literary exchequers of many European countries while in China it hit the worst record by valorising the party leaders as heroes of new romance of the people’s socialism. The attack from the structuralist front, namely from Althusser and the future post-structuralists targeted the humanist romanticism of the Bolshevik commitment, and in turn the human agency to change the world. Even the word commitment underwent a meaning change denoting subservience to the party leadership. The Stalinist purge was the last and the worst attack on revolutionary literature. Williams started his inquiries in these unfavourable times and put forward a new approach to both Marxism and literature in his works.
The book is divided into three sections, 1. Basic Concepts2. Cultural Theory and 3. Literary Theory to deal in concepts as various as culture, language, literature, ideology, determination, structures of feeling, genres, forms, authors, etc. the first section offers a guide to enter into the book with an entirely different awareness about the formation and existence of culture,  language, literature and ideology. The inseparable interconnection between these four categories should reveal the complexity involved in the process of human history. The social production of language as practical consciousness, and the underlying ideological currents and the role of literature as a functioning event of communication are discussed here. Opposing structuralist Marxism, Williams offers a new critical insight into the prevalent practices of treating of language as stable or static, and objectification of language in imperialist line.
The second part of the book is a succinct treatment of the issues in cultural theory. The base and superstructure as two functions of the socio-economic production relations mutually determine the existence of each other. The realm of culture and ideology is not mere reflection of the economic base, but a determining force. The topic of determination comes up here. As Gramsci upheld, optimism of the will is essential to change the world whatever type of pessimism is haunting the world. The role of subjectivity and human agency in shaping the world is undeniable. Social pressures have a significant role in materialising the real “They are also, and vitally, pressures exerted by new formations, with their as yet unrealized intentions”(87). But the abstract determination of quixotic nature is stupendous but doomed to fail despite the serendipities in history. Productive forces are taken into consideration to correspond to the will to change the world. The material forces of history include the forces of nature and the historical continuum of the dialectical evolution of all beings, and the human will.
Bibliography
Marxism and Literature- Raymond Williams
Raymond Williams-Fred Inglis
On Raymond Williams-Cultural Politics Vol.3.ed. Christopher Premdergast.
“Towards Cultural Materialism: Criticism and Hegemony in Raymond Williams”-Roberto del valle Alcala. From revistas.ucm.es web.

On Literature and Art-Marx and Engels.

No comments:

Post a Comment